The mounting body of scientific data today “proves beyond a reasonable doubt” that the universe came into existence out of nothing in a manner consistent with Genesis 1:1 which states, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” The technical synonym of the term, “proves,” defines “knowledge” as “justified true belief” because no claim about physical circum-stances can be fully proved. Neither the sciences nor biblical claims can be proved analytically. Yet since Courts of Law deal with consequential events as opposed to abstractions; criminal verdicts demand reaching full-resolution by a body of evidence that is validated as true “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Revisiting then my opening statement; does the claim of my paper’s title rest on adequate grounds deserving our trust as a foundation that is sufficiently solid to stand on? Consider the following:
1) The laws of rationality state that everything which
had a beginning must have been caused by a source entirely separate from and outside
the universe itself.
2) Our universe is currently expanding just as it has
been ever since its beginning.
3) The entire
contents of the expanding cosmos had its source from its zero-volume-beginning.
4) Because “zero-volume” indicates the absence of
matter, energy, space, and time, prior to its begin-ning point there was no
conceivable means by which “science could have produced it.
5) If skeptics instead posit that a "cosmic egg" gave birth to the cosmos, they must explain how that immeasurably-substantial package remained stable while retaining its capacity to form a functional cosmos (3, above).
6) From its start, its expansion slowed down until near
the mid-point of our cosmic history when it
mysteriously began accelerating.
7) Ever since its “Big-Bang” (BB) hot
blast, the cosmos has been cooling down.
8) Likewise the galaxies continue to spread farther apart
from each other.
9) The afterglow of the BB was discovered in
1972. Preceding that point scientists reasoned
that if the BB was true, there would be a detectable “black-body”
hum. That happenstance cancelled the “oscillating-universe”
and “steady-state” theories as they failed to reconcile with mounting scientific
facts. The BB there-for stands alone
as the only known viable accounting of our cosmic history.
You may also find this articles with footnotes at my website: christianityontheoffense.com
No comments:
Post a Comment